This week, Senator Elizabeth Warren and others issued a statement calling attention to the growing risks posed by partnerships between banks, BaaS providers, and fintechs. As these partnerships expand, so do the threats to consumers and the broader banking system. The recent collapses of fintech firms like Synapse, which left millions of dollars in consumer deposits frozen, highlights the need for stronger oversight and proactive compliance measures.
BaaS (Banking as a Service) allows fintech companies to offer traditional banking services by partnering with regulated banks. While these partnerships offer innovation and flexibility, they also blur the lines between fintech and banking, making it difficult to determine accountability when issues arise. Misleading claims about FDIC insurance—where fintechs imply that consumer deposits are fully protected when they may not be—add another layer of risk.
As highlighted by Senator Warren, when fintechs and BaaS providers fail to meet compliance standards, consumers are left vulnerable. The collapse of Synapse, which froze over $265 million in consumer deposits, underscores the real-world risks of insufficient oversight in these partnerships.
With the rapid expansion of BaaS, banks can no longer rely on traditional compliance methods to monitor these complex partnerships. The manual, reactive approach to compliance is simply not enough in today’s fast-paced fintech environment. What’s needed is a shift toward automated compliance testing, a proactive measure that allows banks to continuously monitor their fintech partnerships for risks, regulatory compliance, and consumer protection standards.
Automated compliance testing provides a solution to several pressing issues:
BaaS revenue is expected to increase tenfold by 2026, and as these partnerships grow, so too will the risks to financial stability. Senator Warren’s call for stronger oversight should serve as a wake-up call for banks. Continuing with manual or insufficient compliance measures will only increase exposure to risk, both for the institution and the consumers they serve.
By shifting to automated compliance testing, banks can not only stay ahead of regulatory demands but also protect themselves and their customers from the types of failures that have already led to significant consumer harm.
Senator Warren’s letter highlights the growing expectation that regulators will exercise their authority to directly supervise BaaS providers and fintechs. This increased scrutiny requires banks to stay proactive, and the best way to meet these rising standards is through automation. Automated compliance testing offers the kind of continuous monitoring and oversight that regulators are demanding and that consumers need to feel secure.
The future of BaaS compliance lies in a proactive approach, where automation not only detects but prevents issues before they become systemic problems. This is not only good for consumers, but also for banks, as it reduces exposure to regulatory actions and reputational damage.
As the landscape of BaaS partnerships continues to evolve, the need for automated compliance solutions becomes clearer. Banks must rethink their approach to compliance, moving away from traditional, reactive models and embracing the efficiency and security that automation provides. This shift will help ensure that they are equipped to navigate the growing complexities of fintech partnerships and stay compliant with evolving regulations.
The time to act is now—before more consumer harm occurs, and before more collapses like Synapse happen. Automation is not just the future of compliance; it is the necessary next step to protect both consumers and the financial system.
Reach out to us today to learn more about how Cable can help your bank or fintech navigate the future of BaaS compliance.
.jpg)
Why Banks and Fintechs Need Good Compliance Programs: Understanding Consent Orders and Their Impact
Will AI + Automated Testing Eliminate the Third Line of Defense?
Navigating Compliance and Regulatory Trends in Banking as a Service: Key Insights from Natasha Vernier and Konrad AltThis week, Senator Elizabeth Warren and others issued a statement calling attention to the growing risks posed by partnerships between banks, BaaS providers, and fintechs. As these partnerships expand, so do the threats to consumers and the broader banking system. The recent collapses of fintech firms like Synapse, which left millions of dollars in consumer deposits frozen, highlights the need for stronger oversight and proactive compliance measures.
BaaS (Banking as a Service) allows fintech companies to offer traditional banking services by partnering with regulated banks. While these partnerships offer innovation and flexibility, they also blur the lines between fintech and banking, making it difficult to determine accountability when issues arise. Misleading claims about FDIC insurance—where fintechs imply that consumer deposits are fully protected when they may not be—add another layer of risk.
As highlighted by Senator Warren, when fintechs and BaaS providers fail to meet compliance standards, consumers are left vulnerable. The collapse of Synapse, which froze over $265 million in consumer deposits, underscores the real-world risks of insufficient oversight in these partnerships.
With the rapid expansion of BaaS, banks can no longer rely on traditional compliance methods to monitor these complex partnerships. The manual, reactive approach to compliance is simply not enough in today’s fast-paced fintech environment. What’s needed is a shift toward automated compliance testing, a proactive measure that allows banks to continuously monitor their fintech partnerships for risks, regulatory compliance, and consumer protection standards.
Automated compliance testing provides a solution to several pressing issues:
BaaS revenue is expected to increase tenfold by 2026, and as these partnerships grow, so too will the risks to financial stability. Senator Warren’s call for stronger oversight should serve as a wake-up call for banks. Continuing with manual or insufficient compliance measures will only increase exposure to risk, both for the institution and the consumers they serve.
By shifting to automated compliance testing, banks can not only stay ahead of regulatory demands but also protect themselves and their customers from the types of failures that have already led to significant consumer harm.
Senator Warren’s letter highlights the growing expectation that regulators will exercise their authority to directly supervise BaaS providers and fintechs. This increased scrutiny requires banks to stay proactive, and the best way to meet these rising standards is through automation. Automated compliance testing offers the kind of continuous monitoring and oversight that regulators are demanding and that consumers need to feel secure.
The future of BaaS compliance lies in a proactive approach, where automation not only detects but prevents issues before they become systemic problems. This is not only good for consumers, but also for banks, as it reduces exposure to regulatory actions and reputational damage.
As the landscape of BaaS partnerships continues to evolve, the need for automated compliance solutions becomes clearer. Banks must rethink their approach to compliance, moving away from traditional, reactive models and embracing the efficiency and security that automation provides. This shift will help ensure that they are equipped to navigate the growing complexities of fintech partnerships and stay compliant with evolving regulations.
The time to act is now—before more consumer harm occurs, and before more collapses like Synapse happen. Automation is not just the future of compliance; it is the necessary next step to protect both consumers and the financial system.
Reach out to us today to learn more about how Cable can help your bank or fintech navigate the future of BaaS compliance.
